Stepmother can't be given family pension under IAF rules: Centre to SC

Stepmother can't be given family pension under IAF rules: Centre to SC

New Delhi, The Centre on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that pension was "not a bounty" and a stepmother couldn't be considered for family pension under the Indian Air Force rules being distinct from the natural mother in both legal and relational terms.

Stepmother can't be given family pension under IAF rules: Centre to SC

Before a bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, the Centre referred to various decisions of the top court relating to maintenance and other welfare benefits which held the term "mother" refers to the natural or biological mother alone and not to a stepmother.

"It is a settled principle of law that, although pension is not a bounty and is claimable as a matter of right, such a right is neither absolute nor unconditional. A person seeking pensionary benefits must establish a clear entitlement under the applicable statutory provisions or regulations," the Centre said.

The Centre's stand came in plea challenging an Armed Forces Tribunal order denying special family pension to one Jayashree Y Jogi.

The Centre said, in the present case, the claim of the appellant , who is the stepmother of the deceased Airman, is governed by the Pensions Regulations for the Indian Air Force, 1961 and as per its Regulation 192, the she does not fall within the category of eligible dependents entitled to receive family pension.

Under regulation 192 the eligible family members of a deceased individual for the grant of a special family pension, provided that they are otherwise qualified: Widow, lawfully married Father Mother Son, actual and legitimate Daughter, actual and legitimate.

The Centre said the term 'mother' as used in Regulation 192 must be interpreted in line with the defined and limited categories of family members under the Regulation.

"Including a stepmother, who, by definition, is not a biological parent, would amount to an unwarranted judicial expansion beyond the scope intended by the legislature," it said, adding that while pensionary statutes are beneficial in nature and generally warrant a liberal interpretation, such interpretation must remain within the four corners of the statute or regulation.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.