E-Paper
Sign in
How Gautam Gambhir's ‘cheat code’ template turned into a booby trap for India at home
India's recent Test defeat to South Africa underscore a flawed strategy, relying heavily on all-rounders while neglecting specialist roles.
Eight recognized batters on the team sheet. Yet India capitulated for 189 and 93 at Eden Gardens, surrendering a home Test to South Africa for the first time since 2010. The all-rounder-first blueprint that once resembled cricket’s ultimate cheat code now looks like a strategic blind spot.
The logic that worked - until it didn’t
India’s template appeared bulletproof on paper. Ravindra Jadeja’s recent entry into the 4000-run and 300-wicket club - joining Ian Botham, Kapil Dev, and Daniel Vettori - validated the approach with elite numbers, not empty promises.
By early 2023, India had accumulated 11 partnerships exceeding 50 runs for the seventh wicket or lower at home since 2021, predominantly featuring Jadeja, Ravichandran Ashwin, and Axar Patel. The formula worked brilliantly - five specialist batters, a wicketkeeper-batter, three spin all-rounders, and two seamers. When the top-order faltered, the lower order rescued matches; when bowlers needed respite, the extra batters doubled as premier spinners.
The fatal flaw? The selection philosophy remained static while conditions and opponents evolved.
The brutal reality check
From October 2024 through November 2025, India contested six home Tests and lost four - a 0-3 whitewash against New Zealand, followed by a Kolkata defeat to South Africa. The fact that India had lost only four Tests at home across the previous 11 years adds further context to the recent debacle.
These collapses weren’t about tail-end fragility. Bengaluru witnessed India being bundled out for just 46. Mumbai saw them fail chasing 147, dismissed for 121 on a turning track. At Eden Gardens, despite deploying Washington Sundar at number three and stacking positions five through nine with Jadeja, Jurel, Axar, and Kuldeep Yadav, India still managed only 189 and 93.
The pattern crystallizes uncomfortably: world-class spin and disciplined pace repeatedly dismantle the top four, yet India persists in stretching the batting deeper rather than strengthening it fundamentally.
Where strategy becomes straitjacket
The overload creates three critical vulnerabilities. First, specialist exclusion - against South Africa, India fielded essentially four specialist batters, one keeper-batter, and four bowling all-rounders, leaving just two frontline seamers on a pitch offering seam movement and bounce for three days.
Second, role ambiguity erodes clarity. Washington Sundar batting at three exemplifies the confusion - is he a genius top-order solution or a fifth bowler who can hold a bat?
Third, pitch preparation feeds the cycle. Banking on Jadeja-Axar-Kuldeep-Sundar, India consistently request a sharp turn. But extreme surfaces have narrowed the competitive gap - opponents now select their own bowling all-rounders and embrace 150 as a defendable total.
The all-rounder abundance has morphed from a competitive advantage into tactical crunch, leaving India vulnerable when the lower-order insurance policy fails to activate.
