E-Paper
Sign in
Jasprit Bumrah schools Mohammad Kaif on public platform for saying India pacer ‘avoids injury’ at the expense of team
Jasprit Bumrah dismissed allegations that he manages his bowling spells to avoid injury.
Social media has now become a battleground where former players’ tactical observations can quickly spiral into heated debates. The rapid-fire nature of the platform often blurs the line between legitimate analysis and speculation about the motivations of a player.
This reality recently hit home when India’s premier pacer, Jasprit Bumrah publicly rebuked former cricketer Mohammed Kaif for suggesting that the pacer strategically manages his bowling spells to avoid injury at the team’s expense.
The post that sparked the debate
Kaif sparked the controversy by comparing Bumrah’s usage under different captains. He noted that under Rohit Sharma, the ace pacer typically bowled over 1, 13, 17, 19, while under the current skipper, Suryakumar Yadav in the Asia Cup, he has bowled three over spells at the start.
The former India batter crossed into contentious territory suggesting Bumrah prefers to bowl while his body is warmed up to avoid injury. This framed the bowler’s tactical deployment as self-serving at the cost of the team.
Jasprit Bumrah’s rebuttal
India’s ace pacer wasted no time in responding to the claims made by the ex-India international. Quote-tweeting Kaif’s post, Bumrah delivered a pointed six word response: “Inaccurate before accurate again.”
While brief, the message was clear from Bumrah. He both rejected the characterization of his bowling patterns and the implication that he influences tactical decisions based on personal injury concerns.
Understanding India’s T20 bowling strategy
Most captains have used Jasprit Bumrah’s one over in the powerplay, one in the middle-overs while using his unique death over skills across two overs in the final four. This deployment depends on pitch conditions, opposition match-ups, game situations and available support around him.
A three-over new-ball burst, while rare, serves specific tactical purposes. It can target aggressive openers, exploit helpful conditions, and modify the team’s strategy on surfaces that favors the spinners more. These decisions represent tactical flexibility, and not player-driven load management.
Bumrah’s response highlights a crucial principle in elite sport, role clarity. India’s T20I bowling plans have evolved with personnel changes from Rohit to Surya’s captaincy, but it actually shows tactical adaptation, not individual preferences.
This episode between the two players serves as a reminder that while tactical decisions are legitimate, attributing strategic decisions to self-driven motives ventures into dangerous speculation territory.
